Blogger's Corner - Fracking News

http://www.gettyimages.com/ http://www.gettyimages.com/ Scott Olson/Getty Images

Clinton Doubles Down Against Fracking in Debate, Raising Alarms

By Jennifer A Dlouhy 11 March, 2016

Hillary Clinton’s promise during a debate Sunday to aggressively regulate fracking deepens the divide between Republican and Democratic presidential candidates on oil and gas development and signifies her continued shift to the left on environmental issues.

In the Democratic presidential debate in Flint, Michigan against Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Clinton said she wouldn’t support fracking in states or local communities that don’t want it, if it causes pollution, or if the chemicals used aren’t disclosed.

"By the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place," Clinton said.

The comments marked a shift for Clinton, who, like President Barack Obama, has generally supported fracking, while insisting methane leaks must be plugged and steps taken to ensure the practice doesn’t contaminate water. She even highlighted natural gas in a campaign fact sheet last month as lowering energy costs, reducing air pollution and putting people to work.

Practical Impact

But translating Clinton’s debate-stage profession into actual regulation clamping down on the technique would be difficult, if not impossible. There are limits to what a president -- any president -- can do to limit the hydraulic fracturing process now being used to free gas and oil from dense rock formations nationwide.

Although state and local governments regulate the practice -- and some ban it altogether -- the federal government doesn’t have much authority to directly regulate fracking on private lands. The biggest openings are through laws allowing the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate air and water pollution tied to fracking, said Kevin Book, an analyst with ClearView Energy Partners LLC. "But these controls are both limited and litigable."

Further, most U.S. oil and gas wells today are stimulated into production using hydraulic fracturing. Shut down fracking, and you shut down the oil and gas boom along with it, said Katie Brown, a spokesman for Energy In Depth, a research program funded by the Independent Petroleum Association of America.

Environmental Credentials

Clinton has worked to burnish her environmental credentials on the campaign trail, pressed by activists who have embraced Sanders and his clean energy agenda. Unlike Clinton’s nuanced stance, Sanders’ response to the issue Sunday was direct: "No, I do not support fracking."

Industry officials viewed Clinton’s fracking answer "as a political response to the guy standing to the left of her on the stage," said Neal Kirby, a spokesman for the Independent Petroleum Association of America.

"She is continually being driven to the left by Senator Sanders," said Mike McKenna, a Virginia-based lobbyist and Republican strategist. Now, "she wants to kill the American energy boom, which is something not even the Obama crew could imagine."

But Clinton’s comments are not enough for some deep-green environmentalists who want an all-out ban on fracking, not just regulation making it more difficult and more expensive.

Environmental Response

"Clinton will continue to struggle to convince climate advocates that she is serious about addressing the crisis until she comes out for a full ban on fracking,” Yong Jung Cho, a campaign coordinator with the environmental activist group 350 Action said in a statement. "Clinton has moved from supporting fracking to insisting on regulations that would make it impossible to frack in most places. It’s high time to come out against it all together."

Sanders has pushed for an end to all oil, gas and coal development on federal lands.

By contrast, Republican presidential candidates have been uniformly supportive of domestic oil and gas development. Donald Trump, the GOP front-runner, says his support of fracking can win votes in New York, where the activity is banned.

"Shutting down U.S. production would make the United States less competitive, more reliant on foreign sources of energy and disrupt the geopolitical advantages that hydraulic fracturing delivers to our allies abroad," said Louis Finkel, executive vice president of the American Petroleum Institute, in an e-mailed statement. "The false choice offered on the campaign trail is a political stunt by those who are spouting populist rhetoric for political points; they are not being honest with American voters."

Last modified on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 12:31
Share
Jennifer A Dlouhy

Jennifer Dlouhy covers energy policy and congressional affairs for the Houston Chronicle and Hearst Newspapers. She regularly reports on how government actions - whether in the halls of Congress or in federal agencies - affect energy producers and consumers nationwide.

Website: www.houstonchronicle.com/author/jennifer-dlouhy/

Related items

  • Fracking isn't contaminating groundwater, study finds

    Fox News Aricale

    A major anti-fracking argument by environmentalists may not have the facts to back it up, according to a new study conducted by Du ...

  • EPA Finds No Widespread Water Pollution From Fracking

    Americans could be forgiven for thinking fracking poses an inherent threat to groundwater.

    The anti-fossil fuel “Keep It in the Ground” movement has waged a multimillion-dollar campaign to convince the public of that exact claim, even though there has never been any evidence to support the accusation.

  • America can double its oil production, says fracking pioneer Harold Hamm

    U.S. drillers have the ability to double the country's oil production to 20 million barrels a day, but doing so too soon would tank oil prices, Continental Resources CEO Harold Hamm said Thursday.

    Hamm, who made his fortune by pioneering new drilling methods in North Dakota's Bakken Formation, did not offer a timeline for when this would be possible, but it would certainly be a difficult task. Surging U.S. production since 2008 was largely responsible for creating a global oversupply of oil that sent prices spiraling from more than $100 a barrel to $26 this past winter.

  • Steelworkers' union Community backs fracking in UK
    "Support for Fracking in the U.K. gaining support among trade unions."

    The main steelworkers' union has backed plans for fracking in the UK.

  • FRACKING, NOT RENEWABLES, IS REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE

    A new study by Oren Cass, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, finds despite massive subsidies and state mandates, renewable energy sources remain a small part of America’s energy supply. Investment in the industry has been flat for almost five years domestically and globally. Even as GDP grew 7.3 percent since 2007, Cass notes, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions fell 9.7 percent from their 2007 peak of 6,001 megatons of carbon dioxide (MtCO2) to 5,417 MtCO2 in 2015.

Login to post comments

About Pattison

The Pattison family has, for their entire 60-year history, consistently proven their commitment to their customers, employees, their community and the environment.

Read more icon

Contact Information

We would be delighted to hear from you.  Feel free contact us any time.
Pattison Sand Company, LLC
701 1st Street
Clayton, IA 52049
  (563) 964-2860
  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Pattison Sand Company, LLC.

Site design by JLMorgan

Employee Center

Our employee center provides instant access to Human Resources Forms & Documents, company event information, announcements and schedules.